Scoring

Scoring methodology

Uthereal ESG peer score · version 1.0

Each dimension averages direction-adjusted metric percentiles across the uploaded universe. The aggregate is the weighted mean of available dimensions. Ties receive their midpoint rank. Missing values are excluded and remaining weights are renormalised; coverage is reported separately. A score is relative positioning, not a probability of return or an investment rating.

Environment 25%

  • Environmental Grade (Scale)
  • ENVIRONMENTAL_PILLAR_SCORE
  • CIU Total GHG (TCO2e / m USD)

Social 20%

  • Social Impact Grade (Scale)
  • Social CSR Grade (Scale)
  • SOCIAL_PILLAR_SCORE

Governance 20%

  • Governance Grade (Scale)
  • GOVERNANCE_PILLAR_SCORE
  • FEMALE_DIRECTORS_PCT

Controversies 15%

  • OVERALL_SCORE
  • VERY_SEVERE_CONTROVERSY_COUNT
  • TOTAL_NUMBER_CONTROVERSIES

Climate transition 20%

  • HAS_SBTI_APPROVED_TARGET
  • CLEANTECH_REVENUE_MS
  • REP_EU_TAXONOMY_REVENUE_ALIGNED

Evidence and investment boundary

The supplied names are fictional. External evidence must match a verified real entity before it supports an investment conclusion. Reports separate facts, estimates, claims, contradictions and gaps; recommendation status remains insufficient evidence when identity, financial inputs, valuation, or source dates cannot be verified. This is research support, not personalised financial advice.